Pranab da You too?

From Congress’s point of view, Pranab Mukharji committed blasphemy by accepting the invitation of untouchable RSS, to speak at their event.

The Elite of India is more Manuvadi than Manu himself. They have strict code regarding untouchables. Whether it is organizations like BJP-RSS or persons like Savarkar-Modi they will try everything to remove every last trace of them from India.

Those who are shouting “Intolerance” on top of their voice are the same people who were supporting the removal of the plaque of Savarkar from Andaman. Now, these people are criticizing Pranab Mukharji for merely accepting the invitation from the Ideological rival.

In Singapore a few months back, Shehejada Rahul Gandhi was giving Gyan about “How talks are important” and “Holding talk with the political opponent is the only way to solve the problem” But he ignored what his own party worker had tweeted a few days back. When sharing the photo of pet dog Pidi, "Office of RG" received comment from HB Sarma as follows.

So much for holding talks.

This is not something new. Gorge Fernandez was once a dear leader of left-liberals because he shook India when he successfully conducted a nationwide Railway strike in 1974. But when he joined hands BJP rose in their ranks and got a prominent position of Defense Minister he became untouchable. The opposition boycotted him. So much so that when he used to answer the questions in parliament, the entire opposition used to walk out.

Ever Heard about retired supreme court judge K T Thomas? He once said “After army RSS Keeps Indians safe” The criticism he faced due to this statement was unprecedented. Similar criticism was hurled at Azim Premji (a muslim business tycoon) who spoke at RSS’s event in 2015.

He said at that event "Some people expressed apprehension that by attending a forum like this I would be seen as endorsing the ideology of the Sangh. I did not follow the advice because I am not a political person. I am however deeply interested in and concerned about my country. Also, I believe that merely speaking at a particular forum does not in any way mean that one endorses all, or any, of the views that might be expressed at the forum, or which may be held by the organizers,"

What sickens me to watch that sazish”. People who propagate that there should be talks with a terrorist country like Pakistan are uncomfortable with Ex-President of India addressing his fellow Citizens. Why there are two different stands when it comes to engaging with terrorist and engaging with your ideological rival?

these people were forced to give an explanation for their acts while no one raised a question when Digvijay Singh releasing a book called “26/11 RSS ki

The priorities of Congress were never been exposed so clearly. They want us to have a cordial relationship with Pakistan while completely cut off contact with our brothers because they have a different political opinion. Pakistan who has not only supporting UN designated terrorist Hafiz Sayeed, but who has hate against Indian civilization ingrained in their mentality.

Congress feel more akin with a proud pakistani than a proud Indian. Is it any surprise then that they are raising a question on Ex-President?

Tommy Who?

Who is Tommy Robinson and why should we care?
Tommy Robinson is British activist and political leader for a small party called EDL.
He has strong views against the religion of peace. And he has been vocal about it.
He is also a friend of India. He has been following Indian politics and social affairs closely. He is as vocal on India as he is in England. He has been demonstrating how the religion of peace is at war everywhere around the world.
British government which is trapped in the Muslims appeasement cannot afford this.
He has been arrested a few days back. This wasn't his first. He was already out on bail. But this could be his last as he was already attacked inside the jail.
While speaking to an American journalist he said that if he is sent to jail again he is sure he is not be coming out alive.
The British system has made all the efforts to silence his voice by freezing his bank account, treating him directly, putting him in jail with in-mate which will be harmful to him. As it turned out attempt on his life was made inside the jail.
Now he is in jail again for exercising his Freedom of Speech. And he needs your help.

This is a link to an online petition for #FreeTommyRobinson


Please sign up and share on facebook & twitter so your friends could help this cause too.
Don't think it is British problem. Tommy is speaking what you and I are thinking. He is our voice. Don't let them silence us. 

Playing with Democracy

Yesterday around 11:30 PM IST, Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook faced EU parliamentary committee for 1:15 hr. The committee was interested in how Facebook was used in shaping the opinion of the general public and what steps it has taken against it. CEO of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg explained how Russians used Facebook to spread propaganda during American presidential election of 2016. As democracies, the leaders of European Union were interested in safeguarding the public from unwanted influence from non-political players to suit their own interests.

While India this week rocked by a scandal much more sinister than that of Facebook. A representative of Vatican, Archbishop of Delhi, Anil Couto, in a letter, called for prayer and fasting, throughout India for purely political and social reasons.

Anil Couto not only failed to apologize but defended himself when confronted by media.

Church, especially roman catholic church has a bloody and long history in meddling the politics across Europe. The term secularism simply means “separation of the state and church”. This new word “Secularism” came into existence due to the active involvement of the church in the political affair of European nations. “Secularism” or separation of Church from politics is fundamental to any democracy. And Roman Catholic Church decided to target just that under the disguise of the social fabric of India.

The church was controlling the affairs of the British government for long. In 1534 Vatican threatens to delegitimize the marriage of King Henry VIII. He, in turn, refused to accept the authority of Vatican over British Churches. Britain achieved its freedom from Roman pope by establishing the Church of England.

French were so fed up with the church that after French Revolution of 1789 they literally went for “Dechristianization of France” They banned christian festivals, & calendar. They exiled 30,000 priests and killed hundreds. Because they had suffered from it for hundreds of years.

In the United States, the very first amendment to their constitution was regarding Secularism. The phrase "separation between church and state" was first coined by Founding Father of America and 3rd President Thomas Jefferson in 1-Jan-1802 in a letter wrote to  Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut.
Germany which is known for Jewish massacre also persecuted 2,720 clergymen from Roman Catholic Church during 1940.

Russia banned Christianity during Soviet Era. Even though China did not take such an extreme step it did, however, clamp down the authority of Vatican to appoint Bishops and Archbishops in China. Chinese church is independent of Vatican.

Roman Catholic religion is hated by democracies and dictatorship alike. After outcasted from every major power around the world,  the Vatican still refused to learn the lesson and trying to influence the politics in India in whatever manner possible.

So is it surprising that Archbishop of Delhi is suddenly worried for Indian Democracy? If you go through the examples I have quoted above you will observe that they were merely a reaction to activities carried out by Catholic Church in the name of religion.

In every country, church was grabbing political power wherever possible.

The church is doing this since it’s inspection. We need to look at this pattern from a broad perspective. “Kadi ninda” is not going to help. Vatican agents are roaming across India influencing political discourse to suit their agenda. We need to take action against this.

First, we should ban foreign pastors who are entering in India daily under the tourist visa. These foreigners do not understand social fabric of this country. They and their foreign religion are the real threat to our nation.

Second, we need to inform people about the birth of secularism. The word was literally invented for separating Church from political power. No equivalent to this exists in any other language of the world.

Finally, we need to be more vigilant about this. The letter wrote by archbishop wasn’t a secret internal memo. If this is what came to light, imagine what they have been planning in secret.

For those who are interested to know more can read “Breaking India” written by Rajiv Malhotra who has done extensive research and gone into much details showing how the foreigner forces are working.