From Congress’s point of view, Pranab Mukharji committed blasphemy by accepting the invitation of untouchable RSS, to speak at their event.
The Elite of India is more Manuvadi than Manu himself. They have strict code regarding untouchables. Whether it is organizations like BJP-RSS or persons like Savarkar-Modi they will try everything to remove every last trace of them from India.
Those who are shouting “Intolerance” on top of their voice are the same people who were supporting the removal of the plaque of Savarkar from Andaman. Now, these people are criticizing Pranab Mukharji for merely accepting the invitation from the Ideological rival.
In Singapore a few months back, Shehejada Rahul Gandhi was giving Gyan about “How talks are important” and “Holding talk with the political opponent is the only way to solve the problem” But he ignored what his own party worker had tweeted a few days back. When sharing the photo of pet dog Pidi, "Office of RG" received comment from HB Sarma as follows.
So much for holding talks.
This is not something new. Gorge Fernandez was once a dear leader of left-liberals because he shook India when he successfully conducted a nationwide Railway strike in 1974. But when he joined hands BJP rose in their ranks and got a prominent position of Defense Minister he became untouchable. The opposition boycotted him. So much so that when he used to answer the questions in parliament, the entire opposition used to walk out.
Ever Heard about retired supreme court judge K T Thomas? He once said “After army RSS Keeps Indians safe” The criticism he faced due to this statement was unprecedented. Similar criticism was hurled at Azim Premji (a muslim business tycoon) who spoke at RSS’s event in 2015.
He said at that event "Some people expressed apprehension that by attending a forum like this I would be seen as endorsing the ideology of the Sangh. I did not follow the advice because I am not a political person. I am however deeply interested in and concerned about my country. Also, I believe that merely speaking at a particular forum does not in any way mean that one endorses all, or any, of the views that might be expressed at the forum, or which may be held by the organizers,"
What sickens me to watch that sazish”. People who propagate that there should be talks with a terrorist country like Pakistan are uncomfortable with Ex-President of India addressing his fellow Citizens. Why there are two different stands when it comes to engaging with terrorist and engaging with your ideological rival?
these people were forced to give an explanation for their acts while no one raised a question when Digvijay Singh releasing a book called “26/11 RSS ki
The priorities of Congress were never been exposed so clearly. They want us to have a cordial relationship with Pakistan while completely cut off contact with our brothers because they have a different political opinion. Pakistan who has not only supporting UN designated terrorist Hafiz Sayeed, but who has hate against Indian civilization ingrained in their mentality.
Congress feel more akin with a proud pakistani than a proud Indian. Is it any surprise then that they are raising a question on Ex-President?
