Saturday, 24 February 2018

Kumar Ketkar on Elitism!


In his unbiased analysis in article

So called eminent, modern, civil, liberal, scientific tempered, respected Senior Journalist and economist Kumar Ketkar has pointed out Single biggest flaw of Modi, or RSS. I don’t know whether Kumar Ketkar identify himself with all the qualities which I have copy pasted from last few lines of his article. But I think he will identify himself as elite (not Elitism).
First we should understand the difference between Elite and Elitism as misunderstood and misguided by 
Kumar Ketkar in his article.

Kumar Ketkar says Modi has loyal following of “corporate class, and admirers (even worshippers) in the middle class, especially among the upper castes”. But according to him being upper cast is different from being ‘Power elite’. In very next line Ketkar Says “But that does not constitute the ‘power elite’.”  And he conveniently remain does not define the Power Elite.

But we can understand what power elite means. Power Elite was those people who were appointing Union Telecom Minister during Congress Rule. They were the Elite who had Power.

But Ketkar tries to misguide you with his so called elitist argument saying “The ‘power elite’ is a social phenomenon that does not have necessarily negative connotations.” Two things here;
First, Power Elite is as social a phenomenon as Johar/Sati was. That doesn’t mean it is correct or acceptable in our democracy. Power elite are nothing more than power brokers. And even though it is reality we all must toil to eradicate these phenomena from our society.
Second, even he doesn’t dare to say ‘power elite is positive phenomena’ because he knows deep down it is not. So he changes the subject, in very next line, by warning us difference between Elite and Elitism.

Ketkar further says “And mind you, this ‘elite’ is not the same as elitism, which is the same kind of phenomenon as Brahminism” So in his world Elitism = Brahminism and Elite = Untouchable??? If Elitism is Brahminism then Elite must be called Brahmin. And mind you, Kumar Ketkar himself is Brahmin. But no you are wrong. Kumar Ketkar set idle for elite as “The ‘elite’ actually have to be liberated from elitism for knowledge and education to spread”. If elite is separated from Elitism will it be called elite or commoner?

He further writes 3 paragraphs on Nehru’s Elite and 4 paragraphs on Indira’s Elite. In last paragraph, on Indira’s Elite, Ketkar write off Emergency in just one line. Emergency by far is worst atrocity committed on Indian Elite after Bkhtiyar Khilji burnt down Nalanda University.  But Ketkar rejoice that “her power elite survived and became an almost ready-made intellectual support system to Rajiv Gandhi” upon this I dare to ask exactly how Elitism is different from Brahminism or Nepotism or even Caste system? Power Elite supporting Rajiv, lone survival of ruling Family, after his mother’s death is example of how Brahminical and castist this so called Elite has become.

Ketkar then went on bashing RSS for not having roots in classical or modern arts and literature even though it is cultural organization.

He then go on mentioning various incidences which his elitist mind finds absurd ideas. While ignoring the absurd ideas that were put forward by the so called elite and now debunk. I have given a small list below.
Ketkar says absurd ideas in his article
Absurd Ideas of Power Elite ignored by Ketkar
Truth
…mythical Pushpak Vimana as evidence of aviation science
Ramayan-Mahabhart are myths. Dwarka never existed.
Dwarka was discovered submerged as the ancient text mentioned.
…condemning Aamir or Shah Rukh Khan on utterly silly charges
If Sonu Nigam condemns Morning Azan then it is intolerance.
Sonu Nigam not only got harassed but also threatened for voicing his displeasure.
…banning women’s entry into beer bars & banning beef and other non-vegetarian food
Men and women are free to eat/drink whatever they want where ever they want.
Mahatma Gandhi called for banning on cow slaughter. And it is part of constitution of India.

Ketkar went on to say about Nehru and Indira that “Visiting ashrams or temples did not compromise their secular convictions” But when Modi did Ganga Pooja the power elite was all over to question his convictions.

In next paragraph Ketkar start by saying “Nehru himself has written glorious chapters on ancient Indian history in his magnificent tome, Discovery of India.” But he doesn’t not mention the “1857 First war of Independence” or “6 Glorious Epochs of Indian History” By V D Savarkar because it does not fit his Elitist narrative.

In his last paragraph Ketkar has made correct diagnosis on wrong patient. He says “The collapse of civilised behavior, which has become new social norm, is a result of this march towards medieval notions.” People all over the world know who is marching towards medieval notion.
But the best came at the last. Ketkar says “Modernity, civility, liberalism, scientific temper, respect for global knowledge traditions, appreciation of arts and literature must come from the leadership, from the ruling ideology.
That is where the ‘elite’ culture must prevail.
Just read this statement for couple of times. You could feel the heartbroken Ketkar. It is well known that Ketkar is no fan of Modi. And now that you have found some weakness of Modi, you as being Power Elite, must exploit it. But rather than talking about exploitation of weakness Ketkar is practically begging Leadership/Ruling Ideology to appreciate power elite. Because he seems to have lost all hopes in Congress ever coming back to power and now he is searching appreciation from elsewhere.
He took an ABSURD leap of wishful thinking when he says Elite Culture मेव जयते. And left his readers wondering when Ketkar stepped from Power Elite to Elite to Elite Culture and in what sense Elite cultural is different from Elitism which he himself denounced at the beginning of the article.

Wednesday, 7 February 2018

Is BJP preparing for Snap election?

Snap election is a term used in the western world for calling early election. This phenomenon is only possible in Parliamentary set up of democracy because government is formed by Members of Parliament. In Presidential Democracy like United States of America or France where President is Head of the State as well as Head of the Government there is no power to be consolidated. Because President of the country can choose minister as he wishes.

Recently in October 2017 Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe went for early election. It worked well for him. North Korean Nuclear Crisis looming over the head, Japanese voters chose to unite under Abe rather than supporting new party like Hope Party formed by Former Mayor of Tokyo.

But for Theresa May it was disaster. Election held in April 2017 to consolidate her power actually resulted in loss of Majority in the House of Common earlier. Theresa May lost 13 MPs while winning 317 seats falling just short of Clear Majority of 325.

Many Left and secular thinkers predicted that Modi may go for early Election. Why will BJP do that?

  1. The very first reason why ruling party goes for early election is because they want to catch opposition unprepared. If you have a chance to surprise your opposition you will take it in any game. In election you need sufficient time to prepare for gathering of funds and men to fight the election. By calling early election ruling party just do not allow opposition enough time to prepare strategies or plan for fight. Opposition will have to rush in the battle field unprepared. While ruling party can secretly prepare for months. But after Gujrath Election, Congress which was down all the way, has found new hope and voice. They will give a good fight if election called now. Currently Congress is pumped up with Gujrath results while BJP is taking hit for GST and Budget.
  2. GST was supposed to ease the inflation. The trickledown effect is yet not seen on scale which was expected. GST yet not became a settled law. There are many provisions which required being iron out. So GST will be risky proposition for government when people are actually not feeling the benefit. And for early election it will be much more risky.
  3. People also points out the Farmer centric budget as an evidence that BJP is preparing for early election. BJP want new voters to join them. From past 3-4 years BJP has become confident that urban voter is staying with them even after Demo. Now they want to snatch few farmer/rural votes from opposition to retain their majority in next Loksabha. Though it seems a decent thought, Farmers are not going to feel the benefit of government's scheme in this Rabbi/Winter season. Most of the farming in India is Kharip/Rain season based. So real benefit of the budget will be felt only at the end of Kharip season that is Oct-Nov. There are several things that can go wrong in 9 months from Budget till October 2018. Hence budget could be one factor but it could not be decisive factor for calling election.
  4. Prime Minister Modi's speech on motion of thanks to the President’s Address in Loksabha on 07-Feb-18 was display of all around attack on Congress. His speech was purely political. Some pointed out that Modi has gone into election mode. People who have listened to the speech will notice constant background NAREBAZI from opposition. It may be this slogan shouting that would have put him in attacking mode. But he was going to say those words and present those facts none the less. May be he knew what to expect from congress. So he prepared for political speech all along. But I think it is worth considering.
  5. BJP will like to throw the baggage of Shiv Sena, Akali, Paswan from the alliance. These supporters did not add much value to NDA. While Shiv Sena is playing roll of opposition in the state of Maharashtra, Akali and Paswan lost their power and hold on masses. BJP formed the government with former ally Nitish Kumar in Bihar. Ram Vilas Paswan and his Lok Janashakti Party could not help BJP in Bihar. While Akali gave congress it's first victory in Punjab. Recently TDP members also protested against government for not allowing special status to Andhra Pradesh. In all this turmoil it is understandable if BJP want early election to ease functioning of government.

Finally I feel, this is not the time for deciding on early election. Even if BJP dissolve Loksabha tomorrow (Which they will not, because Budget needs to be passed) Election commission could not arrange for election on such a short notice. It will take 3-4 months. That will push the election in June. It will not be possible to conduct election in rainy season. So whatever happen today election could not take place before September 2018.
But at the same time BJP as a political party will like to have option available in October 2018. Decision to go for early election or not will happen only in Sept-Oct 2018. But it will be beneficial for BJP to have options in hand. They are preparing for ‘it’, that is beyond doubt. BJP is a political machine which has perfected the art of winning election. Whether they actually decides for it and under what circumstances are to be seen.

Saturday, 5 August 2017

Indo-China (Doklam Issue)

Daily till Ajit Doval’s vist of BRICS nation to China. And since then once in 2 days, China state run media the Global Times has been issuing WAR threats to India.
The Doklam area under dispute is very sensitive issue for the India and it’s army. China is building Road in this remote area. India Army has since the beginning has taken firm stand against this road project. Even though China is building this road in it’s on territory according to Bidu map India has legitimate reason to oppose any such construction. 1st this road project is not far from India’s Siliguri corridor which is the narrow strip of land connecting North-East with rest of India. If China engages in road or any other sort of construction in the area it will directly affect India’s Military ability to protect it’s northeastern state. China always wanted a piece of India’s north eastern state. in Indo-China war of 1962 even after winning some part of India state Arunachal Pradesh China had to pull back it’s forces because there was no road to establish supply chain from Tibet. So if this time China build a road they might be able to hold on their position. And India will have hard time defending it’s states as well as dependent nation Bhutan.
During the cold war of 1962 Russia (then USSR) wanted to build a Missile base in Cuba. USA had launched extreme opposition to that plan. So much so that both countries were ready to go for war. Today China is arguing that whatever we do in our territory is our business. But at the same time opposing installation of US made THAAD in South Korea. Even though THAAD is aimed against threat of North Korea it will hamper Military capability of China. Hence India has same ground to oppose China for Road construction as China has to oppose South Korea.
If this conflict escalate will there be war?
China has army of 2.2 million standing. India has 1.4 million. But recently China has declared to reduce it’s army by 1 million. Ans savings made on salary will be spent on modernization and up-gradation of Military Machine. Recently speaking in a function of 70th PLA anniversary Chinese President said that “China need its army more than ever” This raises the doubts about preparedness of Chinese Military called PLA. The last battle faught by PLA was in 1979 against Vietnam. People’s Army of Vietnam was inferior in equipment and and lesser in numbers. But still it delivered a might blow to PLA. Hence even after 1 month since incidence first reported china has done nothing but issuing war threat from it’s news papers. China is constantly asking India to remove it’s soldiers from the position. What it really meaent is “Let us build our road”. And India is not ready to compromise. When Indian defense minister Arun Jaitley said “This is not India of 192” What he really meant was “We are not ready for compromise”.
Currently China is only testing preparedness of India. Even if China build the road it doesn’t mean there will be war in next decade. But this is just to test preparedness of Indian Army and Indian counselor in foreign embassies. Currently no country has openly supported China in this conflict. This is why China’s response is comparatively mild.
Some people are linking this issue with 19th National Congres of CCP to be conducted in November this year. But I think Xi is very well prepared for November and all set to be back in power.